From NAMI National Website
NAMI purposely has not spoken out about the Britney Spears ordeal in recent weeks, in part because we do not presume to diagnose anyone's illness and try to respect a person's privacy - even when it's being violated by others.
We also have not wanted to feed the media circus.
Even Dr. Phil, who tried to exploit the story, has expressed regret for saying that the 26-year old singer was "in dire need of both medical and psychological attention."
"If I had to do it over again," he said, "I probably wouldn't make any statement at all. Period."
Many StigmaBusters have been appalled by sensationalized media coverage of the story, particularly supermarket tabloids like The Star, which ran the headline "Britney's insane; her spiral into madness." However, a few persons have praised PEOPLE magazine, which ran a cover story on "Britney's Mental Illness," while providing a relatively balanced discussion about "likely bipolar disorder," that focused on symptoms and the need for treatment.
Roy Peter Clark, vice-president of the Poynter Institute, a leading center of journalism training and ethics, wrote in an on-line column: "One of the terrible side effects of America's celebrity and media culture is a pervasive cynicism about addiction and mental illness...We are all complicit... .I'm no Puritan when it comes to gossip, and I've grown up reading the tabloids, but there is clearly a danger zone, when life and health are at stake, when the best thing the press can do is back off. That time for Spears is probably now."
"Avoiding the daily soap opera does not require journalists to abstain from critical and analytical pieces on celebrity, addiction, gender and mental illness," Clark continued. "Perhaps the troubles of a particular celebrity might be an occasion to turn the camera away to the less intriguing but more important cases of mental illness in our own communities."
| join our newsletter mailing list |